Crappy Coverage
I've noticed something about the MSM coverage of the Supreme Court race. They are really only running three stories:
1) Ziegler is corrupt.
2) There's too much independent money in the race.
3) The race is nasty.
What I see missing is any real coverage of the two candidates, their histories, their judicial philosophies, and their comments that may indicate how they will behave on the court. There have been a few mentions, but they are usually buried in some other stories.
Could it be that many people in the MSM don't want to dig too deep in the areas of experience and judicial philosophy? Or is it just the MSM being lazy again by regurgitating what Clifford's PI hands them and using the race to push for their favorite causes?
1) Ziegler is corrupt.
2) There's too much independent money in the race.
3) The race is nasty.
What I see missing is any real coverage of the two candidates, their histories, their judicial philosophies, and their comments that may indicate how they will behave on the court. There have been a few mentions, but they are usually buried in some other stories.
Could it be that many people in the MSM don't want to dig too deep in the areas of experience and judicial philosophy? Or is it just the MSM being lazy again by regurgitating what Clifford's PI hands them and using the race to push for their favorite causes?
posted by Owen @ 10:41 AM
<< Home