Feingold wants a terrorist safe haven?
So the U.S. Senate stayed up all night arguing over whether to Bring The Troops Home Now or not.
End result: they didn't.
Most interesting fact I've seen about the whole ridiculous exercise: this amendment to the Senate bill (via Don Surber):
I'm waiting to see some statement from Feingold on the vote, but, geez, Russ, are you saying that a failed Iraq and a safe haven for terrorists is in our national interest?
Or are you just that Kos-crazy?
End result: they didn't.
Most interesting fact I've seen about the whole ridiculous exercise: this amendment to the Senate bill (via Don Surber):
”To express the sense of the Senate that it is in the national security interest of the United States that Iraq not become a failed state and a safe haven for terrorists.”The amendment passed 94-3. Voting no: Byrd, Harkin, and our own Russ Feingold.
I'm waiting to see some statement from Feingold on the vote, but, geez, Russ, are you saying that a failed Iraq and a safe haven for terrorists is in our national interest?
Or are you just that Kos-crazy?
<< Home